Taveta Investments Limited (“Taveta”) – the parent company of Arcadia Group Limited, which owns a number of high street brands including Topshop, Topman and Miss Selfridge and which used to own the BHS group prior to its collapse in 2015 – applied to the High Court for a continuation of interim restrictions on the publication … Continue reading Application for the continuation of interim publication restrictions imposed on the Financial Reporting Council refused; stricter public law test for interim relief applied

In SDI Retail Services Ltd v King and others [2018], the applicant, a provider of replica football kit and other branded merchandise to Rangers football club, successfully applied for an interim injunction preventing Rangers from entering into another agreement with a third party provider. On the applicant’s case, by entering such an agreement Rangers would … Continue reading Interim injunction granted preventing football club from contracting with an alternative merchandise provider

In UTB, LLC v Sheffield United Ltd 2018, the High Court considered whether it was able to grant an interim injunction to compel one shareholder (A) to pay a sum of money to maintain, as a going concern, the company in which both it and another party (B) had substantial shareholdings. The two 50% shareholders … Continue reading COURT HAS JURISDICTION TO ORDER SHAREHOLDER TO PAY SUM TO PRESERVE COMPANY AS A GOING CONCERN

In PJSC Tatneft v Bogolyubov and others [2018], the defendant (‘D’) applied to vary the terms of a worldwide freezing order to provide that an asset list that he had previously disclosed would constitute the only asset disclosure that he would be required to provide, despite it not being comprehensive. The basis for the application … Continue reading COMMERCIAL COURT REINFORCES THE REQUIREMENT OF FULL DISCLOSURE OF ASSETS FOR FREEZING ORDERS

In Cartier International AG v British Telecommunications, the Supreme Court decided that Internet Service Providers (“ISPs”) should not have to bear the cost of complying with website blocking injunctions to block access to websites infringing a rights-holder’s trade marks. Interestingly, this decision is the first one confirming the availability of blocking orders against websites infringing … Continue reading CARTIER INTERNATIONAL AG & ORS (Respondents) v BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC & ANOR (Appellants) (2018)