Cosmetic Warriors Ltd v Amazon.co.uk Ltd concerned the form of injunction granted in a trademark infringement case in the context of keyword use.  Amazon had been held to have infringed the community trade mark (“CTM”) LUSH (that also being the trading name of Cosmetic Warriors) via its use of the keyword LUSH in sponsored adverts … Continue reading Form of injunctive relief to be imposed in trade mark infringement case

In Ashworth v The Royal National Theatre, the High Court rejected an application by a group of professional musicians for an interim injunction in relation to or specific performance of their contract with the National Theatre. The claimants were engaged to play live during the theatre production War Horse. However, the defendant decided that the … Continue reading Specific performance: court rejects application for an interim injunction or specific performance in relation to musicians’ contract

The County Court Remedies Regulations 2014 came into force on 22 April 2014, conferring additional powers on the County Court in relation to freezing injunctions and search orders. The 2014 Regulations replaced 1991 Regulations of the same name, which expressly removed the court’s jurisdiction to grant freezing injunctions. There is no equivalent provision in the … Continue reading The County Court Remedies Regulations 2014: new powers for the new unified County Court

In Kazakhstan Kagazy plc v Arip, Mr Arip, the director and CEO of the parent company of a substantial group of companies (in the business of logistics and recycling in Kazakhstan) appealed against the Commercial Court’s refusal to discharge a freezing injunction made against him. Mr Arip was accused of participating in two large frauds, … Continue reading Court of Appeal refuses application to discharge freezing injunction and clarifies test

In AB v CD, the Court of Appeal held that a party which applies for an interim injunction to prevent a breach of contract may argue that damages will not constitute an adequate remedy where there are contractual terms which exclude or limit liability for loss that would be caused by such a breach.  The … Continue reading Whether damages constitute an adequate remedy where there is a contractual provision limiting damages

Credit Suisse Trust v Banca Monte Dei Pasche Di Siena involved two separate but linked applications for Norwich Pharmacal orders against Italian banks. Norwich Pharmacal orders allow the applicant to obtain information from a third party mixed up in the proceedings to identify, and therefore allow for a claim against, the wrongdoer. A trust, of … Continue reading Jurisdiction to grant Norwich Pharmacal order against a party outside the jurisdiction if they have a branch within it

Unusually, in AAH Pharmaceuticals Ltd v Mercury Pharmaceuticals Ltd and another, the High Court has granted an ex parte mandatory interim injunction. The courts are often reluctant to make such an order, because where the defendant is ordered to take a positive step at an interim stage, there is a greater risk of injustice to … Continue reading Court grants ex parte mandatory interim injunction

In Capgemini India Private Ltd v Krishnan, former employees of Capgemini, following termination of their employment, gave a contractual undertaking to observe post-termination restrictive covenants set out in their contracts of employment. When Capgemini sought to enforce these restrictive covenants by means of an injunction, the employees argued that the underlying restrictive covenant was actually … Continue reading Injunction to enforce restrictive covenant: relevance of employee undertaking to observe restriction

On 26 February 2014, the Supreme Court handed down an important judgment in Coventry (t/a RDC Promotions) v Lawrence relating to the principles of private nuisance, a common law tort, and also when an injured party would be entitled to an injunction in preference to a pure damages remedy. Restoring the trial judge’s original order, … Continue reading Supreme Court ruling relating to injunctions and noise nuisance

In Georgian American Alloys Inc v White & Case LLP, the court granted a permanent injunction to prevent a firm of solicitors from acting for or advising Mr Victor Pinchuk in multi-billion dollar proceedings brought by Mr Pinchuk in the Commercial Court.  The judgment illustrates the high threshold required to satisfy the court that sufficient … Continue reading Permanent injunction to prevent solicitors acting in a Commercial Court action

A blog to report on the important and developing area of the law as it relates to injunctions